Cont'd
Back Home Email Me About Me Read Guestbook Guestbook Archives Sign Guestbook Where Are They? What's New Find It Need It Links Books Your Old Photos 1920's Map Current Map |
Back | Cont'd | |
The Kitty Genovese Murder Scene
The timing problem
So, given all the possibilities for delay, it is not hard to imagine that by the time they opened their windows and located where the scream came from, many witnesses could have missed seeing Moseley at all, or even seeing Kitty prostrate on the ground. If all they saw was Kitty, alone, wandering off dreamlike, they would have had even less reason to suspect a criminal attack.
Times Article Analyzed
Disclaimer
In the Public Domain This page was created on January 14 2004 and revised on March 13, 2004. | The Murder of Kitty Genovese: The witnesses saw Kitty leave and not come back When Moseley drove off after the first attack, Kitty (who had been lying on the ground) got up "slowly". [Footnote E-1.] Trial witness, Robert Mozer testified that: "She got up, stood up, and kind of looked around like that ... ." [Footnote E-2.] Trial witness, Irene Frost testified that: "Then it looked like she was reaching for her purse. She bent down again and picked something up. I don't know what it was ... ." [Footnote E-3.] At this point, there was nothing in Kitty's body language to tell an unknowing onlooker who had not seen the stabbings that she was gravely wounded. Everyone agrees that Kitty then walked away, but there is disagreement as to the steadiness of her gait. Trial witness, Andree Picq, said that Kitty walked away "slowly". [Footnote E-4.] According to former New York City Chief of Detectives, Albert A. Seedman: "[Kitty] was not staggering. If anything, her step was almost dreamlike." [Bracketed text is mine.] [Footnote E-5.] The History Channel described her walk the same way. [Footnote E-6.] If these accounts are correct, then there was still nothing about her body language that would put unknowing eye witnesses on notice that Kitty had been badly wounded. However, surviving witness, Michael Hoffman, and his father had perhaps the closest view of all. Hoffman describes her walk as more labored. "The way she walked made us think she was either drunk, or had been beaten up. She walked slowly, holding on to the building wall for support as she did. She staggered." [Footnote E-7.] Ordinarily, that kind of unsteady gait would be a sure sign to an onlooker that something was wrong even if it does not necessarily suggest the possibility of life threatening wounds. However, there was another factor that shaped the perceptions of witnesses who did not have Hoffman's view.
Click here to read a detailed analysis of the March 27, 1964 New York Times article that broke the story.
Footnote E-2: Trial Testimony of Robert Mozer, Record on Appeal p. 59. [HTML] [PDF - 57 KB]
Footnote E-9: See, e.g., Brief of the Queens District Attorney to the New York State Court of Appeals, p. 2. [HTML] [PDF - 368 KB] ("After she parked her car, Katherine Genovese became frightened and ran when she saw Moseley. He ran after her for about twenty feet and stabbed her twice in the back, on the street. Her screams awakened several of her neighbors ... .")
Footnote E-12: Edward Weiland, "Austin Street Can't Forget an Unheeded Cry in the Night", The Long Island Press, p. 5, col. 4 (March 28, 1964) ("Many of the people who live in the buildings near Kitty genovese's apartment are elderly.") |