Cont'd
Back Home Email Me About Me Read Guestbook Guestbook Archives Sign Guestbook Where Are They? What's New Find It Need It Links Books Your Old Photos 1920's Map Current Map |
Back | Cont'd | |
The Kitty Genovese Murder Scene
Times Article Analyzed
Disclaimer
In the Public Domain This page was created on January 14 2004 and revised on August 29, 2004. | The Murder of Kitty Genovese: Kitty did not scream for half an hour Although the original March 27, 1964 New York Times article does not say so, it was reported or implied in subsequent press accounts that Kitty screamed continuously throughout all or most of her 30 minute ordeal. [Footnote H-1.] If that were true, then it did not matter whether witnesses saw the stabbings or heard her say she had been stabbed. That kind of screaming would have been an unambiguous signal to the witnesses that Kitty was in desperate trouble. However, the belief that Kitty screamed for anything close to that length of time is mistaken.
"It seemed like I better get the car out of there right away. So I ran back and put it in reverse and backed around the corner of the next block. It was quiet. I didn't hear anybody coming out or doors slamming. I waited ten minutes. It was still quiet." [Footnote H-2.] So, for 10 minutes after the first attack, the killer heard nothing and it was that very silence which convinced him it was safe to return and continue the attack.
[Footnote H-10.] Although the argument is a reasonable one, it does not prove the case against the 38 witnesses for a number of reasons.
Under the circumstances, those witnesses would naturally have assumed that Mozer's warning had solved whatever problem there was.
Click here to read a detailed analysis of the March 27, 1964 New York Times article that broke the story.
Footnote H-2: Seedman & Hellman, Chief!, p. 129 (Arthur Fields Books, N.Y. 1974).
Footnote H-4: Seedman & Hellman, Chief!, p. 114 (last para.) (Arthur Fields Books, N.Y. 1974) (N.B. Seedman uses fictitious names for the witnesses).
Footnote H-10: See, e.g., Jim Rasenberger, "Kitty, 40 Years Later", The New York Times, (Final Ed.) Sect. 14 , p. 1 , col. 2 (Feb. 8, 2004) ("But [one of the Assistant District Attorneys who prosecuted Moseley] is far less willing ... to forgive the neighbors. Even if not all saw the crime, Mr. Skoller is convinced they heard it. 'I believe that many people heard the screams,' he said. 'It could have been more than 38. And anyone that heard the screams had to know there was a vicious crime taking place. There's no doubt in my mind about that.'). Click here to read a copy of the article on the Fordham University web site. Close out the window to return here.
Footnote H-12: See, e.g.,
Footnote H-13: Martin Gansberg, "37 Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police", The New York Times, p. 38, col. 1 (March 27, 1964)
|